Trading and investing

Let’s Compare Bets gateway to trading and investing information. Learn how to trade sports bets and financial markets, or invest in financial markets and antepost betting markets. This section of Let’s Compare Bets is a sub section of our main website, Let’s Compare Bets.  Let’s face it, many things in life are a gamble, trading and investing are quite similar.  The outcome is unknown, but, Let’s Compare Bets aims to educate and provide visitors with the information needed to get closer to trading and investing goals.  Remember to bookmark Let’s Compare Bets or add us to favourites (ctrl D) so that you can find us again.


Trading what? Lot’s of things can be traded from, goats… if you are in the mountains of the middle east to financial assets.  Stocks, shares and commodities can be traded by normal people or people on the trading floor working in a high stress trading environment.  After the invention of the betting exchange even betting odds can be traded.  One in ten people trading online make massive profits.  Slightly more make small returns and the rest loss money.   This section investigates the types of trading and methods to make the path to successful trading easier whether it’s bet trading or financial trading. Better yet, join Let’s Compare Bets and get a free Betfair training document to get started on Betfair. Look right!


Investing is more long term than trading and favours a slower but more relaxed route to financial independence.  Investing  is more capital intensive but can be more rewarding in the long run.  Get investing help from someone making investing decisions right now. This section investigates investing techniques, publishes stock tips and has our very own portfolio.

Use the search box or the category list to search this section. Use the subscribe buttons to the top right to get the latest posts on Bet trading, financial trading, and financial investing.

Continue Reading · 0

The letter is dead long live Royal Mail

Royal Mail’s bread and butter business is in structural decline.  As sure as video killed the radio star email has killed the letter.  Following the accession of a new monarch in various countries on lookers would proclaim ” the king is dead, long live the king “.  As one monarch dies they salute the new monarch.  Royal Mail’s letter business is dying but they are saluting new avenues of growth from Parcel Deliveries in the UK and around the world through the wholly owned dutch subsidiary General Logistics Systems (GLS).

Let’s take a look at why Royal Mail could be a good investment.  Royal Mail was fully privatised for the first time in 500 years in October 2013.   During is life as a state run monopoly Royal Mail built up a massive asset base and had no pressures regarding operating efficiency (like modern publicly listed companies do).  It employees are well treated with generous pensions and sorting offices use aging technology.  For the new management of Royal Mail cost saving opportunities will be around every corner.  From making better use of technology to bringing the employee pension scheme up to modern standards.

Modern technologies are being employed to create productivity gains, the work force has been reduced and the number of mail centres and delivery offices have been reduced.   Rivals like Deutsche Post (DP) where privatised years ago and it has had a marked positive affect on their business (possibly not for employers but for the business).  DP sports operating margins of close to 8%.  Royal Mail’s operating margins are just over half of that figures so they’ve got some catching up to do.  Catching up is what they are currently doing.

What has an investment in Royal Mail share got going for it?

  • Lots of low hanging fruit for saving costs, costing savings plan increased to £600M by 2018.
  • Can bid for contracts outside of the UK allowing Royal Mail to benefit from Globalisation. GLS operating in 42 European Countries and all over the world and is the 3rd largest parcel delivery provider in Europe. Revenues from this part of the business are growing at nearly 10% per year.  Stimulation of Eurozone economies by the European central bank are feeding through to GLS’ main markets including Germany, Italy and France.
  • Operating profit margins and operating profits should rebound as transformation costs reduce and investments in acquisitions start to enhance earnings. Geographic expansion has been made having purchased ASM in Spain and GSO in California, USA.
  • More control over pricing in the UK and in the other countries they operate in.
  • Online shopping is growing at 10% per year.  Parcel Deliveries are becoming a larger part of the delivery Market help offset the decline in letter deliveries.  Royal Mail should continue to win a significant part of this business despite competition from TNT, DP and Yodel.
  • Offering customers a better service.  Personally having bough myself a new watch recently with Royal Mail’s 24/7 tracked service I new where it was each step of the way.
  • Royal Mail owns lots of property.  As property prices have inflated the value of not or under used Royal Mail property has soared.  Sale of these assets to property developers desperate for quality plots in prime London locations will help fund Royal Mail future expansion plans and pay it’s dividend. Owning property is also a good hedge against inflation.
  • Royal Mail debt is relatively low.  Interest payments are covered by operating earning easily and net debt is a comfortable amount.
  • Dividend growth was over 5% last year and is expected to be over 4% this year.  The dividend yield is currently higher than average.
  • As far as the share is concerned it is in a range bound market and currently sits at the bottom of the range.  Making a increase to the upper end of the range a good bet.

What are the negative aspect of investing in Royal Mail

  • Higher transformation costs and investment spend has hit operating profits and reduced profit margins
  • The dividend is barely met by free cash flow after capital expenditure, financing and acquisition costs. Albeit higher due to the current transformation and acquisitions to lay down geographical expansion.
  • Amazon are delivering their own parcels.
  • Increased competition from Rivals, espcially in the UK market.  For instance Deutsche post has moved into the UK market by buying UK Mail.
  • Regulatory burdens reducing competitiveness, such as having to provide the universal service
  • Slightly overvalued compared to the transportation industry average (not taking into account dividend growth)

Big questions remain

Can the growth in Global operations and high performance of UK Parcel deliveries offset the reduction in revenue from UK letter deliveries?

Can acquisitions add to growth after financing costs?

Will the cost reduction programme go to plan without spiraling transformation costs?

Will dividend increases continue at the current rate?

Opinion of the author; Royal Mail is a good bet based on dividend yield, dividend growth rate, manageable debt levels, transformation plan of decreased costs, technological enhancement and productivity drive going to plan, and the global expansion.  A reduction in operating costs will see it’s share price move up and reduce it’s PE ratio to be inline with that of Deutsche Post, which has a 5 year average PE of around 15 and a lower dividend yield.


Disclosure; the author owns share in Royal Mail. 




Continue Reading · 0

The spectre of inflation is creeping up on us

Deciding where to place financial bets on company sectors, mega trends, individual companies, and collective investments like investment trusts are effected by macro economic factors.  This post is intended to tackle the concept of inflation and how it’s going to affect where readers may want to invest.

Mervyn King Baron of Lothbury, former Governor and member of the Monetary Policy Committee, spoke at a speech in 2013 and said that he has worked during a really ‘nice’ period in financial history.  King coined the term NICE to mean a period of “non-inflationary consistently expansionary”, NICE.  Companies and the economy continued to grow without any of the negative side effects normally associated with economic growth.  Inflation is one of these negative side effects.  Products (food, petrol, housing, etc) and services (legal, accounting etc) remained affordable whilst more and more people where employed and experienced rising wages.  Not only where things affordable many things got less expensive, like, personal computers, and cars.

NICE was a consequence of globalisation (relocating certain industries and work to places in other countries particularly China) and technological advances (including supply side reforms such as automation) which kept a lid on inflation.  During the 1990s that worked very well, but what’s changed?  Debt.  An explosion of debt which started with the low interested rate policies of Alan Greenspan former Federal Reserve chairman (various factors went into the mix with those decisions including the Sept 11th terrorist attacks).

What’s happened now?

NICE turned into a period of low or no growth with disinflation (falling inflation) or outright deflation.  Times like these really bring into focus the importance of placing the right financial bets and investing wisely for the future.  Debt has been discussed in more detail on other pages in the investing section here on Let’s Compare Bets.  In short, the financial authorities want to avoid a period like the 1930s when there was a depression with falling prices and low unemployment.  A period where Al Capone held the keys to the whiskey cabinet and people where desperate to make ends meet.  Now, due to the amount of debt in the system financial authorities need inflation to keep the system working.  Inflation in wages, economic gross domestic product etc  helps to reduce the amount of debt as as wealth (or money creation) out paces debt.  Deflation on the other hand increases debt, as there is less money to pay interest and make capital repayments, which causes less disposable income for buying goods and services, or, less money for companies to invest for the future. An increasing debt pile, no employment, and a time like the 1930s.  For normal people this would mean a time where there is no whiskey, no job, and and lots of frustrated people.

Right now political changes are bringing a catalyst for change.  President elect Trump in the USA brings inflation friendly policies and rhetoric to the table.  He has openly criticised America’s central bank for policies which are now causing serious harm to the economy.  Especially the very low interest rates and the possibility of negative interest rates, which have various negative sides effects including making banks very unstable and causing pensions to be under funded.

President Trump plans to reverse some of the drivers of low inflation.  Reducing the free movement of people, like illegal immigrants crossing the Mexican border (which stops wages being depressed).  Reducing the effects of globalisation by using trade tariffs and spending big on infrastructure.  Low corporate tax rates have been proposed which should encourage USA Inc. to bring their case hoards back to the USA.  Also many companies will be encouraged to bring manufacturing back from overseas.  President Trump want’s Apple to manufacture the iPhone in the USA and to bring their massive cash pile back home.  With low tax rates and a population getting paid more money Apple may be willing invest more in the USA to secure their future growth, for instance they are rumoured to be entering the automatic car market.  Trumplation will also include big infrastructure spending paid for by creating money through the central bank (money printing).

Things are changing in Europe.  Trump seems very friendly with Nigel Farage who has been one of the main architects leading the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union.  Apparently Trump doesn’t drink or smoke so it can’t be for the love of beer and cigars that Trump wants to cosy up to Nigel.  More likely is that President Trump supports Mr Farage’s view on Europe.  The UK was the first to leave Europe but the big question now is who will be next and when?

An exit from the European Union has been positive for the United Kingdom and has helped play a part in rebalancing the economy.  As the value of Pound Sterling dropped the price of imported goods have gone up helping promote supply side inflation.  Now we’ll have to wait and see if wages follow suit.  When wages start to follow suit interest rate rise won’t be far behind.  As the European Union continues to be remodelled there will be increased volatility in financial markets (prices plunging and rebounding), but, as an exit (sorry Brexit) has been good for the United Kingdom it would be good for other countries that leave in turn having a positive affect on the world economy.

How will inflation affect your financial bets

Continue Reading · 0

House of cards, or, one small step for man but many steps for mankind

Investing money for the future is a topic we like to cover on Let’s Compare Sporting betting, financial betting, and investing all have roots in a similar place. Investing is not all that different from betting. For people who want to invest their money directly into financial markets there are striking similarities. To have a long term investment strategy you have to take a view or form an opinion about the future in order to improve your financial circumstances. A future that is shaped and moulded by a variety of different influences making the end result difficult to predict. This post will focus on how rapidly increasing technological progress will help shape the future.

In the same way as someone who really enjoys football or horse racing can take an opinion on the outcome of a match or race, this post is another in a series of posts analysing financial markets with a view to help investors: possibly people who want to take a ‘DO IT YOURSELF’ approach to providing for a pension, a nest egg, or helping your kids buy their first home. We will take a quick look into the past, then look at what is happening now, how things may turn out in the future, and then how we can profit from it. As anything in life remember to do your own research (DYOR) and caveat emptor.

Change is and has accelerated at an exponential rate at least according to Ray Kurzweil. So it’s worthwhile making a few pie in the sky predictions to help with our analysis not least because it’s makes an otherwise dry topic for some, much more interesting.

So what does the future hold for financial bets and investments?

Have you ever heard the saying ‘ you don’t know where you are going, until you know where you’ve been’. Before taking a journey into the future let’s look at what’s happened in the past that will influence potential returns on our investments.

A big trend affecting all financial investments has been intervention in financial markets by national central banks and actions of political governments. Recent history has seen a massive build up in the supply of money in society. Power in the world has been centred on a capitalist structure, which the USA has been presiding over as current global superpower. USA has overseen a massive increase in global wealth as a result of adapting monetary policy so that money itself is no longer linked to gold. A system that only had it’s roots in tradition. This was a system that worked on the notion that gold is a finite resource (as Gold was made in exploding stars and there is only so much of it available on earth); it has very good properties for use in industry; and for use as money. For instance it does not react with the environment causing it to degrade. For these and other reasons it has worked as a means to pay for goods or services. If the whole financial system and society fell apart people would probably resort to using gold to pay for things, as well as, trading skills and commodities like food.

Removing the link to gold in the monetary system allowed financial institutions to create more money by providing credit. Deregulation of banks and financial institutions amplified this trend. More credit for consumers, business, and organisations. Financial historians and academics have known that these problems have been building up for decades. Negative consequences have included a number of financial crises over time which have been getting bigger and bigger in line with the amount of credit and money in the system. Lehman Brothers collapsing in 2008 was a result of this phenomenon. Many people have criticised the system since the crisis and the negative affects have been felt globally: despite this there have been significant positive effects.

An increase in the amount of money in the system has pushed up the value of various financial assets, from houses, land, companies, and commodities. Consequently people are more wealthy. People from around the world have benefited from an unprecedented increase in wealth, due to the effects of globalisation and free markets. Global financial markets and trade links have become more and more intertwined. Also people have been free to move around more easily. Despite there being massive imbalances in wealth between rich and poor significant numbers of people have been lifted out of poverty due to this process. Infant mortality rates have dropped and on various measures things have been looking increasing rosy.

Lehman Brothers was the bank that the Federal Reserve in the USA allowed to fail. It wasn’t to big to to blow a fatal hole in financial markets but almost. Since Lehman Brother’s a big force driving the future of financial markets and returns that readers here can expect on their investments has been central bank intervention in markets. They have been the ones keeping the wheels on the wagon.

Debt leverage and the amount of risk in the system is still very high and has not gone down since the last financial crisis but gone up. Let’s look at some banks to see what is happening now. Deutsche Bank (DBK) is on a list of important banks to the global financial network of banks, insurance institutions, and financiers. Deemed to big to fail. In simple terms Lehman Brothers had assets of $639 and $619 of liabilities. Compare that to DB which has Assets of 1.64 trillion Euros and liabilities of 1.58 trillion Euros. Banks do something unique which is to account for their loans as assets. Essentially a stream of future interest payments. The trouble with this situation is that it only takes a small change how many loans are actually getting repaid to change the way the bank accounts for this debt. If they state in public via their accountants or via the credit ratings agencies that their loans are more risky (or less likely to be repaid) it will cause a domino affect with global repercussions. Another interesting stat for DB is that they have lent out 100 Euros for every 11 Euros of cash that they can access quickly. That does not sound so bad. There is a big BUT. The system has allowed all these loans to be classed as being low risk. In reality there is a lot more risk on their balance sheet than has be reported. A small change in the balance of assets and liabilities would wipe out DB and topple the first domino or rather multiple dominos. Just one more stat about DB before we continue. One of the assets reported on DB’s company accounts are financial derivatives. Derivatives introduce something called counterparty risk, which is the risk that either DB or the holder of the other side of the contract can not live up to their obligations. What is the value of derivatives that DB has? $72 trillion dollars. That’s right, $72 trillion. More than the money that the USA as a country makes in a year. Using dominoes falling as an analogy does not really do it justice. If DB goes down it will take HSBC and Credit Suisse with them straight away and the rest will be history.

So, DB is too big to fail and the authorities can’t let it happen. Who has been bank rolling and stabilising financial markets? It’s National Governments in the USA, UK, Europe and Asia. Banks in the USA have now been fixed. The UK has almost finishing fixing UK banks. Next it’s the turn of European banks. Europe has not really started the process of fixing the banks yet, as this example of DB shows. Germany is really the one that controls Europe’s financial authorities. Germany have refused to bail out Greece with their financial difficulties and have instead imposed austerity on the country. The trouble is that Germany sitting on the biggest financial time bomb of all and that’s DB. Specifically DB’s operations in the USA. Germany are stuck between a rock and a hard place. How can they bail out one of their own banks and refuse to bailout Greece (then there is Italy, and so on)? They’ll have to come up with something because DB is too big to fail. Either way it’s going to be another problem for the European project in it’s current state. The idea of a united Europe is being questioned and problems with DB will fuel the rise of populist political parties who want to leave Europe.

How have authorities stabilised the system?

By creating more money. Otherwise known in the media as printing money, which, is the same as adding zeros to the number for national debt of governments. Central Banks have used a range of methods including quantitative easing or money printing. The USA has done this to the biggest extent.

where, why, how to place your financial bets

Continue Reading · 0